In the modern era, presidential public addresses have become important poli
tical tools, bill need favorable media coverage to succeed. Yet little is k
nown about how media cover these events. This study examines New York Times
coverage of State of the Union Messages to test four sets of possible infl
uences on the press- objective reality, liberal bias, the " credibility gap
, " and "news" biases toward the "game" of politics. It finds the news bias
es to be the most powerful explanation, indicating that the political " sta
te of the President " determines the tone of coverage more than a liberal b
ias, the " credibility gap " of recent years, or even the " actual " state
of union itself.