According to the laws of negligence, jurors' liability decisions are to be
influenced by the defendant's conduct, but not by the severity of the plain
tiffs injuries. We conducted a jury simulation study to assess whether juro
rs reason in this manner. We manipulated the conduct of the defendant (reas
onable, careless) and the severity of injuries to the plaintiff (mild, seve
re) in a simulated automobile negligence case. Jurors completed predelibera
tion questionnaires, deliberated to a verdict, and answered postdeliberatio
n questionnaires. The defendant's conduct had a strong impact on liability
judgments, but evidence related to injury severity also had an effect, albe
it smaller. We analyze these findings in the context of various cognitive a
nd motivational theories.