The English comparative correlative construction (e.g., The more you eat, t
he fatter you get) embeds like an ordinary CP, and each of its clauses disp
lays an ordinary long-distance dependency. However, the connection between
the two clauses is not ordinary: they are connected paratactically in synta
x, but the first clause is interpreted as if it were a subordinate clause.
The construction's mixture of the general and the idiosyncratic at all leve
ls of detail challenges the distinction between "core" and "periphery" in g
rammar and the assumption that some level of underlying syntax directly mir
rors semantic structure.