The authors report the findings from an exploratory investigation of the us
e of UPC scanner data in the consumer packaged goods industry in the U.S. T
he study examines the practitioner community's view of the use of scanner d
ata and compares these views with academic research. Forty-one executives f
rom ten data suppliers, packaged goods manufacturers, and consulting firms
participated in wide-ranging, in-person, interviews conducted by the author
s. The interviews sought to uncover key questions practitioners would like
to answer with scanner data, how scanner data is applied to these questions
, and the industry's perspective regarding the success that the use of scan
ner data has had in each area.
The authors then compare and contrast practitioners' views regarding the re
solution of each issue with academic research. This produces a 2 x 2 classi
fication of each question as "resolved" or "unresolved" from the perspectiv
es of industry and academia. Along the diagonal of the 2 x 2, issues viewed
as unresolved by both groups are important topics for future research. Iss
ues deemed resolved by both groups are, correspondingly, of lower priority.
In the off-diagonal cells, industry and academics disagree. These topics s
hould be given priority for discussion, information exchange, and possible
further research.
Practitioners reported that scanner data analysis has had the most success
and been most widely adopted for decision making in consumer promotions (i.
e., coupons), trade promotions, and pricing. For example, legit and regress
ion models applied to scanner data have revealed very low average consumer
response to coupons which has directly led to reduced couponing activity. M
anagers also reported high levels of comfort with and impact from analyses
of trade promotions and price elasticities. While industry views most of th
e issues in these areas to be resolved, academic research raises concerns a
bout a number of practices in common commercial use. These include price th
reshold analysis and trade promotion evaluation using baseline and incremen
tal sales.
In product strategy, advertising, and distribution management, practitioner
s reported that the use of scanner data has had more limited development, s
uccess, and impact. In the case of new product decisions, scanner data use
has been slow to develop due to the inherent limitations of historical data
for these decisions and a heavy reliance on traditional primary research m
ethods. In advertising, scanner data is widely analyzed with models, but co
nfusion among practitioners is very high due to controversies about methods
(e.g., what level of data aggregation is best) and conflicting results. In
distribution and retail management, scanner data use has tremendous potent
ial but a mixed track record to date. Thus, practitioners view the use of s
canner data as unresolved for most issues in product strategy, advertising,
and distribution. This view is largely, though not entirely, consistent wi
th academic research, which has only begun to address many of the key quest
ions raised by practitioners.
In Light of the large number of unresolved issues and mixed record of scann
er data use to date, the authors offer a series of specific recommendations
for immediate and longterm research priorities that are likely to have the
greatest impact on commercial utilization of UPC scanner data. Topics of i
mmediate priority include price thresholds and gaps, baseline and increment
al sales, base price elasticity, competitive reactions, measurement of adve
rtising effects, management of brand equity, rationalization of product ass
ortments, and category management. Long-term priorities include a greater e
mphasis on profitability versus sales or market share, developing prescript
ive models versus descriptive models, and the need for industry standards.