M. Montoya-weiss et Rj. Calantone, Development and implementation of a segment selection procedure for industrial product markets, MARKET SCI, 18(3), 1999, pp. 373-395
The purpose of this paper is to develop and illustrate a systematic segment
selection procedure that models the tradeoffs among evaluation criteria an
d organizational resource constraints. The target audience for this paper i
s both managers and academic researchers. For managers, our segment selecti
on procedure provides assistance in formulating new product strategy by cre
ating a common structured framework for understanding and resolving tradeof
fs among segment evaluation criteria. For researchers, the procedure addres
ses an important gap in past segmentation research. The state-of-the-art in
segmentation methods provides sophisticated analytic techniques for identi
fying homogenous groups of customers based on their preferences and optimal
ly allocating resources to any subset of these segments. However, the inter
mediate decisions, involving how to evaluate the attractiveness of each seg
ment and how to select the appropriate segments to serve such that long-run
profitability is maximized subject to firm constraints, continue to be tre
ated in an ad hoc manner. Segment selection is the critical link between th
e segment formation and resource allocation processes.
Organizations are made up of people who represent different functional area
s that are measured against different goals and performance requirements. T
hus, the real challenge in segment selection is developing a model that coo
rdinates resource competitive goals across the functional areas of an organ
ization. Effective segment selection requires integration of the various de
cision criteria that play interrelated roles in determining product profita
bility, marketability, and manufacturability. Our research objective is to
develop and illustrate a structured segment selection procedure that balanc
es multiple decision criteria, thereby managing organizational diversity of
views among key decision makers.
The segment selection procedure provides a more structured approach to elic
iting and explicitly modeling the tradeoffs among the multiple decision cri
teria. The segment selection procedure is a system of methodologies that id
entifies and selects market segments and product portfolios such that custo
mer preferences, organizational objectives, and resource constraints are si
multaneously satisfied. We employ a multistage research methodology incorpo
rating conjoint analysis, cluster analysis, a product design optimization s
imulation, and a multiobjective integer programming (MOIP) model. Developme
nt of the MOIP model requires balancing the science of mathematical optimiz
ation against the art of problem definition and the reality of the implemen
tation context. Our procedure facilitates management involvement in model d
evelopment and blends managerial intuition with the model solution so that
the final solution is optimal for the organization's situation. The segment
selection procedure provides a structured method for balancing divergent p
erformance metrics and normatively allocating resources to serve selected s
egments. Overall, the segment selection procedure combines mathematical mod
eling methods and managerial wisdom to design a total marketing plan for se
gmentation.
Through an illustration in the automotive supply industry, we show that our
procedure is an effective approach for integrating marketing, manufacturin
g, and financial performance information in the segment selection decision
process. The segment selection procedure provides a framework for extensive
sensitivity analysis of tradeoffs among alternative decision criteria so m
anagement can resolve how best to balance its short and long-term goals. Th
is procedure is a generalizable process for systematic planning and winnowi
ng down market opportunities according to carefully defined criteria. Succe
ssful implementation of the procedure requires managerial involvement and a
blend of science and art. In our illustration, the final solution was a bl
end that leveraged the structure of the modeling process against the subtle
ty of the implementation context.