Brilliant blue and violet structural colours are common plumage ornaments i
n birds, but their signalling functions are poorly understood(1). This may
be because birds also communicate in ultraviolet (UV-A) wavelengths (320-40
0 nm)(2-5), invisible to humans, but a strong spectral component of many st
ructural colours(6). From a wild population of blue tits-Parus caeruleus, s
exually dimorphic primarily in the ultraviolet(7,8)-we report experimental
evidence that females skew the sex ratio of their offspring in response to
the ultraviolet plumage ornamentation of their mates. Masking male ultravio
let reflectance reversed a positive correlation between reflectance and bro
od sex ratio observed in control pairs, demonstrating a causal effect of ma
le ultraviolet ornamentation on offspring sex ratio. Ultraviolet reflectanc
e also predicted male survival to the following breeding season, suggesting
that it serves as a viability indicator. When taken together with ecologic
al effects (laying date, nesting area), our experiments reveal that an unex
pected amount of control exists over the primary sex ratio in birds, sugges
ting that chromosomal sex determination may not constrain the sex ratios of
multiparous vertebrates.