Aj. De Smit et al., Laboratory decision-making during the classical swine fever epidemic of 1997-1998 in The Netherlands, PREV VET M, 42(3-4), 1999, pp. 185-199
The National Reference Laboratory for classical swine fever (CSF) virus in
the Netherlands examined more than two million samples for CSF virus or ser
um antibody during the CSF epizootic of 1997-1998. The immense amount of sa
mples and the prevalence of border disease (BD) virus and bovine viral diar
rhoea (BVD) virus infections in Dutch pig herds necessitated the diagnostic
efforts of the laboratory to be focused on generating CSF specific test re
sults throughout the eradication campaign.
Detection of 82% of the 429 outbreaks was achieved through the combined use
of a direct immunofluorescence and peroxidase assay (FAT/IPA) with samples
(tonsils) collected from clinically-suspected pigs. This suggests that in
the majority of the outbreaks, the pigs had clinical signs that were recogn
ised by the farmer and/or veterinarians, indicating the presence of CSF vir
us in a pig herd. A positive diagnosis of 74% of all the tissue samples (to
nsils) collected at infected pig holdings was established by FAT. More than
140,000 heparinised blood samples were examined by virus isolation, result
ing in the detection of 4.5% of the infected herds. CSF virus was isolated
in approximately 29% of all the blood samples collected from pigs at infect
ed or suspected farms.
Several serological surveys - each done within a different framework - led
to the detection of 13.5% of the total number of outbreaks. The detection o
f CSF virus antibody in serum was carried out by semi-automated blocking EL
ISA. Approximately 28.5% of the sera which reacted in the ELISA were classi
fied as CSF virus-neutralising antibody positive and 26.5% as positive for
other pestiviruses following the virus neutralisation test (VNT).
We concluded that two of the CSF laboratory diagnostic methods described we
re determinative in the eradication campaign first, the FAT for the screeni
ng of diseased pigs; and second, the ELISA and VNT when millions of predomi
nantly healthy pigs needed to be screened for the presence of CSF serum ant
ibody. Decision-making on the basis of results generated by either method c
an, however, be seriously hindered when samples are examined from pig herds
with a high prevalence of non-CSF pestiviruses. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science
B.V. All rights reserved.