Vl. Willson et al., The relationships among orthographic components of word identification andspelling for grades 1-6, READ RES IN, 39(1), 1999, pp. 89-102
Students in grades la who were part of the norming sample for the Kaufman T
est of Educational Achievement took both a word identification task, Readin
g Decoding, and a spelling test. Each word in both tests was coded for ling
uistic components: number of phonemes, consonant blends, vowel digraphs, co
nsonant digraphs, r-controlled vowels, silent markers, and regular or irreg
ular pronunciation/spelling of the word. For each student a regression anal
ysis was performed to predict whether the student could successfully pronou
nce (spell) the word using the linguistic components as predictors. The reg
ression weights were then used in various multivariate analyses along with
overall word identification and spelling performance to investigate relatio
nships among the variables.
Correlations among the two sets of variables, word identification and spell
ing linguistic components and achievement, indicated generally high correla
tions at all grade among linguistic components and achievement, and between
word identification and spelling achievement. Structural equation models w
ere developed at each grade, treating linguistic components as exogenous va
riables and achievements as endogenous. Specific patterns varied at each gr
ade level that appeared to be consistent with instructional emphases at eac
h grade level in both reading and spelling. For example, phonemic length wa
s important at grades 1-2 but not beyond, for both reading and spelling, wh
ile components such as vowel digraphs and silent markers vary with grade in
their importance for reading and spelling. Word regularity is more importa
nt to spelling than reading beyond grade 2, as students encounter increasin
g difficult spelling words. Regularity in word identification does not appe
ar to play a role in upper grade activities.