A study was initiated to assess interest, educational effectiveness, a
nd implications of genetic testing for the common BRCA1 mutation, 185d
elAG, in the Ashkenazim. Of 333 individuals who attended group session
s, 309 (92%) participated in the study. Participants were categorized
as having negative family history (67%), positive family history (defi
ned, by a relaxed criterion, as one first-degree relative or two secon
d-degree relatives with breast [premenopausal] or ovarian cancer) (22%
), positive personal history (7%), and both positive personal history
and positive family history (4%). Group education was effective, as sh
own by the improvement in participant scores from pre- to posteducatio
n tests. For the 289 individuals (94%) who requested testing, the majo
r reasons included concern for their own risk, concern for the risk of
their children, and desire to learn about surveillance options. The m
ost common reason given by participants who declined testing was conce
rn about health insurance. Six participants found to be heterozygous f
or the 185delAG mutation received results and were offered genetic cou
nseling, Participants had consented for additional testing without rec
eiving results and were screened for the 6174delT mutation in BRCA2, a
nd seven were found to be positive. All identified carriers reported a
t least one first- or second-degree relative with a history of breast
or ovarian cancer, although they did not all meet our study criteria f
or positive family history. Given these outcomes, we conclude that scr
eening for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility is most appropriat
e for individuals with a positive personal or positive family cancer h
istory. We propose a guideline for future studies designed to identify
individuals who may benefit from genetic testing for inherited breast
and ovarian cancer.