Identification of mango cultivars of Thailand and evaluation of their genetic variation using the amplified fragments by simple sequence repeat-(SSR-) anchored primers

Citation
W. Eiadthong et al., Identification of mango cultivars of Thailand and evaluation of their genetic variation using the amplified fragments by simple sequence repeat-(SSR-) anchored primers, SCI HORT A, 82(1-2), 1999, pp. 57-66
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Plant Sciences
Journal title
SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE
ISSN journal
03044238 → ACNP
Volume
82
Issue
1-2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
57 - 66
Database
ISI
SICI code
0304-4238(199912)82:1-2<57:IOMCOT>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
Twenty-two mango cultivars (Mangifera indica Linn,), including 13 Thai, fou r Florida, three Indian, one Indonesian, and one Philippine cultivar, were examined for 40 simple sequence repeat (SSR-) anchored primers of 15-18 oli gonucleotides which were provided by Biotechnology Laboratory, University o f British Columbia. Of the 40 primers screened, seven primers gave reproduc ible, polymorphic DNA amplification patterns, and were selected to construc t a DNA fingerprinting table to distinguish the genotypes of mango. The num ber of bands generated ranged from 8 to 21 per primer. By banding patterns obtained from these seven primers, each cultivar in this study could be dis tinguished from the others, indicating that PCR by using SSR-anchored prime rs was an efficient method for cultivar identification. Similarity coeffici ents were calculated based on 56 selected bands and UPGMA clustering analys is was performed. Two Thai mango cultivars ('Nang Klangwan' and 'Nong Saeng ') were found to be very far distant of the genetic relationship from the o ther cultivars. The remaining 11 Thai cultivars were classified into three groups based on the dendrogram. Seven cultivars were placed in the same gro up as two Florida cultivar ('Brooks' and 'Edward'), one Philippine cultivar ('Carabao') and one Indonesian cultivar ('Arumanis'). Four other Thai cult ivars were scattered into two groups; each group contained Indian cultivars . Our analysis did not give clearly distinction between the polyembryonic a nd monoembryonic seed races. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights rese rved.