Throughout the evolution of XPS, the ability to compensate for surface char
ging and accurately calibrate the binding energy scale, particularly with e
lectrically inhomogeneous samples, has remained one of the most intractable
problems. The last decade, however, has seen some quite significant advanc
es in this area.
Best exemplified perhaps by the Kratos (UK) 'in the lens' electrostatic mir
ror/electron source coupled with a magnetic immersion lens, a number of con
cepts have been advanced that take a quite different conceptual approach to
charge compensation, They differ in a number of fundamental ways from the
electron hood-type compensators, which are widely used and historically are
absolutely essential with instruments based on monochromatized sources, Ev
en more recent has been the use of combined ion and electron flood systems.
Thus, modern approaches to compensation represent a more sophisticated und
erstanding both of how charging arises and how it may be mitigated to impro
ve the accuracy and utility of XPS spectra, Copyright (C) 1999 John Wiley &
Sons, Ltd.