The implications of Lake Ontario regulation under transposed climates
with changed means and variability are presented for seasonal and annu
al time scales. The current regulation plan is evaluated with climates
other than the climate for which it was developed and tested. This pr
ovides insight into potential conflicts and management issues, develop
ment of regulation criteria for extreme conditions, and potential modi
fication of the regulation plan. Transposed climates from the southeas
tern and south central continental United States are applied to thermo
dynamic models of the Great Lakes and hydrologic models of their water
sheds; these climates provide four alternative scenarios of water supp
lies to Lake Ontario. The scenarios are analyzed with reference to the
present Great Lakes climate. The responses of the Lake Ontario regula
tion plan to the transposed climate scenarios illustrate several key i
ssues: (1) historical water supplies should no longer be the sole basi
s for testing and developing lake regulation plans; (2) during extreme
supply conditions, none of the regulation criteria can be met simulta
neously, priority of interests may change, and new interests may need
to be considered, potentially requiring substantial revision to the Bo
undary Waters Treaty of 1909; (3) revised regulation criteria should b
e based on ecosystem health and socio-economic benefits for a wider sp
ectrum of interests and not on frequencies and ranges of levels and fl
ows of the historical climate; and (4) operational management of the l
ake should be improved under the present climate, and under any future
climate with more variability, through the use of improved water supp
ly forecasts and monitoring of current hydrologic conditions.