The staging of dementia is ideally based on both an examination of the pati
ent and a history taken from an informant. However, in some circumstances,
only an informant history is possible. The aim of this study was to assess
the validity of the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) when the rating is based
solely on informant data. The CDR was used in a study: of 360 persons aged
78 or older who were participants in a community survey the Sydney Older P
ersons Study. The CDR was completed in two ways: (1) a social scientist mad
e the ratings based on an informant interview; and (2) a physician made the
ratings after an examination of the subject. All CDRs were scored in the c
onventional way, as well as by the revised method proposed by Gelb and St.
Laurent (Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 1993;4:202-11). The informant CDR showe
d moderate agreement with the clinician CDR, showing that it would be a val
id substitute in situations in which the subject could not be examined. The
revised scoring method was slightly easier to implement than the conventio
nal method.