Cf. Royse et al., Measurement of cardiac output by transoesophageal echocardiography: A comparison of two Doppler methods with thermodilution, ANAESTH I C, 27(6), 1999, pp. 586-590
This study assessed the agreement between three methods of cardiac output (
CO) measurement, thermodilution the current clinical standard and two trans
oesophageal echocardiographic techniques. Measurements were performed in 37
patients using thermodilution, continuous wave Doppler across the aortic v
alve and pulsed wave Doppler positioned irt the left ventricular outflow tr
act, The aortic valve area was measured by direct planimetry); and the left
ventricular outflow tract area was calculated from ifs diameter: Weighted
least products regression analysis was employed to detect bias, and standar
d deviation of the difference (SDdiff) was calculated There was no fixed bi
as but there was proportional bias between continuous wave Doppler arm ther
modilution methods (SDdiff 0.92 l/min). There was Fred bias but not proport
ional bias between pulsed wave and thermodilution methods (SDdiff 1.1 l/min
). There was neither fixed nor proportional bias between poised wave and co
ntinuous rt ave Doppler methods (SDdiff 1.1 l/min). The transoesophageal Do
ppler methods described carl be clinical alternatives to thermodilution car
diac output measurement.