Measurement of cardiac output by transoesophageal echocardiography: A comparison of two Doppler methods with thermodilution

Citation
Cf. Royse et al., Measurement of cardiac output by transoesophageal echocardiography: A comparison of two Doppler methods with thermodilution, ANAESTH I C, 27(6), 1999, pp. 586-590
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care
Journal title
ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE
ISSN journal
0310057X → ACNP
Volume
27
Issue
6
Year of publication
1999
Pages
586 - 590
Database
ISI
SICI code
0310-057X(199912)27:6<586:MOCOBT>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
This study assessed the agreement between three methods of cardiac output ( CO) measurement, thermodilution the current clinical standard and two trans oesophageal echocardiographic techniques. Measurements were performed in 37 patients using thermodilution, continuous wave Doppler across the aortic v alve and pulsed wave Doppler positioned irt the left ventricular outflow tr act, The aortic valve area was measured by direct planimetry); and the left ventricular outflow tract area was calculated from ifs diameter: Weighted least products regression analysis was employed to detect bias, and standar d deviation of the difference (SDdiff) was calculated There was no fixed bi as but there was proportional bias between continuous wave Doppler arm ther modilution methods (SDdiff 0.92 l/min). There was Fred bias but not proport ional bias between pulsed wave and thermodilution methods (SDdiff 1.1 l/min ). There was neither fixed nor proportional bias between poised wave and co ntinuous rt ave Doppler methods (SDdiff 1.1 l/min). The transoesophageal Do ppler methods described carl be clinical alternatives to thermodilution car diac output measurement.