We have investigated in a prospective double-blind study, recovery from ana
esthesia induced by two admixtures of propofol and thiopentone and compared
it with a third group of patients who received propofol and lignocaine, Ni
nety unpremedicated ASA 1 or 2 patients scheduled for elective gynaecologic
al laparoscopy as a daycase procedure were randomly allocated to receive on
e of three different mixtures for induction of anaesthesia as part of a sta
ndardized anaesthetic: Group P-50: propofol 1% 10 ml/thiopentone 2.5% 10 ml
, Group P-75: propofol 1% 15 ml/thiopentone 2.5% 5 ml, Group P-100: propofo
l 1% 20 ml/lignocaine 1% 4 mi Recovery from anaesthesia was assessed for up
to four hours post-induction by critical flicker fusion threshold and best
post-box toy completion time. Comparison was made with preoperative baseli
ne performance, There was no significant difference in postoperative recove
ry between the three groups with either assessment but no group returned to
their mean preoperative performance levels within the first four hours pos
t-induction. Nor was there any difference between the groups with respect t
o postoperative analgesia or anti-emetic administration Utilizing the most
sensitive end-point, a sample of nearly 1000 patients in each group would b
e required to confirm the observed difference with a power of 0.8 based on
the data from this study. In comparison with lignocaine, the addition of th
iopentone to propofol does not delay recovery from anaesthesia and does not
increase postoperative analgesic or anti-emetic requirements.