At the end of the 20th century, endocoronary ultrasonography has become est
ablished in many catheter laboratories. The information provided by this te
chnique of invasive imaging has many qualitative and quantitative features.
Is endocoronary ultrasonography a research or an everyday clinical tool to
be used systematically or occasionally in routine procedures?
Endocoronary ultrasonography is really a research tool because it is not re
dundant with conventional coronary angiography. Ultrasonography investigate
s the whole arterial wall. Its spatial resolution is twice that of angiogra
phy Its contribution in this field is rich with many reports on arterial mo
delling, post-angioplasty remodelling, plaque rupture and atherothrombosis,
the accurate description of the mechanical effects of angioplasty tools, t
wo and three-dimensional quantification of atherosclerotic plaques and, fin
ally, providing a very accurate biomechanical approach.
Its use in routine procedures is only occasionally justified as there is no
scientific proof in favour of a more widespread use with respect to changi
ng. the procedure or to evaluating patient prognosis.
Endocoronary ultrasonography, a very rich technique, should be available in
all catheter laboratories for occasional use.
This technique is useful for all cardiologists performing coronary angiopla
sty by improving the evaluation of atheromatous plaques and countering the
intrinsic ambiguities of coronary angioplasty.