De. Mcmillan et M. Li, Lack of difference between HAD and LAD rats in the stimulus generalizationof ethanol to nicotine, BEHAV PHARM, 10(8), 1999, pp. 809-812
High alcohol drinking (HAD) and low alcohol drinking (LAD) rats were traine
d to discriminate 0.5 g/kg ethanol from saline. HAD and LAD rats learned th
e discrimination at the same rate and to the same level of asymptotic perfo
rmance. In substitution tests, increasing doses of ethanol produced increas
ed responding on the ethanol lever with dose-effect curves that were very s
imilar in HAD and LAD rats. There was no generalization from ethanol to nic
otine, or d-amphetamine, in either HAD or LAD rats, These data may be contr
asted with data obtained with alcohol preferring rats (P rats) and alcohol
non-preferring rats (NP rats), where the ethanol discrimination was learned
more rapidly, asymptotic performance was better in P than in NP rats, and
ethanol discriminative stimulus generalized to nicotine and partially to d-
amphetamine in P, but not in NP rats. These data suggest that the differenc
es in ethanol consumption reported previously by P and HAD rats relative to
NP and LAD rats is not necessarily related to strain differences in ethano
l discrimination as the differences in ethanol discrimination previously ob
served between P and NP rats do not occur in HAD and LAD rats, (C) 1999 Lip
pincott Williams & Wilkins.