Dynamic imaging of the metaphase II spindle and maternal chromosomes in bovine oocytes: Implications for enucleation efficiency verification, avoidance of parthenogenesis, and successful embryogenesis
T. Dominko et al., Dynamic imaging of the metaphase II spindle and maternal chromosomes in bovine oocytes: Implications for enucleation efficiency verification, avoidance of parthenogenesis, and successful embryogenesis, BIOL REPROD, 62(1), 2000, pp. 150-154
Manipulations of DNA and cellular structures are essential for the propagat
ion of genetically identical animals by nuclear transfer. However, none of
the steps have been optimized yet. This study reports a protocol that impro
ves live dynamic imaging of the unfertilized bovine oocyte's meiotic spindl
e microtubules with microinjected polymerization-competent X-rhodamine-tubu
lin and/or with vital long-wavelength excited DNA fluorochrome Sybr14 so th
at the maternal chromosomes can be verifiably removed to make enucleated eg
gs the starting point for cloning. Suitability of the new fluorochromes was
compared to the conventional UV excitable Hoechst 33342 fluorochrome. Enuc
leation removed the smallest amount of cytoplasm (4-7%) and was 100% effici
ent only when performed under continuous fluorescence, i.e., longer fluores
cence exposure. This was in part due to the finding that the second metapha
se spindle is frequently displaced (60.7 +/- 10%) from its previously assum
ed location subjacent to the first polar body. Removal of as much as 24 +/-
3% of the oocyte cytoplasm underneath the polar body, in the absence of fl
uorochromes, often resulted in enucleation failure (36 +/- 6%). When labele
d oocytes were exposed to fluorescence and later activated, development to
the blastocyst stage was lowest in the group labeled with Hoechst 33342 (3
%), when compared to Sybr14 (19%), rhodamine-tubulin (23%), or unlabeled oo
cytes (37%). This suggests that longer wavelength fluorochromes can be empl
oyed for live visualization of metaphase spindle components, verification o
f their complete removal during enucleation, and avoidance of the confusion
between artifactual parthenogenesis versus "cloning" success, without comp
romising the oocyte's developmental potential after activation.