Jb. Semmens et al., Trends in repeat prostatectomy after surgery for benign prostate disease: application of record linkage to healthcare outcomes, BJU INT, 84(9), 1999, pp. 972-975
Objective To compare the risk of repeat prostatectomy for benign prostatic
hyperplasia (BPH) in a population-based cohort of 19 598 men in Western Aus
tralia treated by transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) or open pr
ostatectomy over a 16-year period.
Patients and methods The Western Australian Health Services Research Linked
Database was used to extract all hospital morbidity data, death records an
d prostate cancer registrations for men who had prostate surgery for BPH in
1980-95. The cumulative incidence of first repeat prostatectomy calculated
using the actuarial life-table and incidence-rate ratios of the first repe
at prostatectomy, comparing TURP and open prostatectomy, were obtained usin
g Cox regression.
Results The cases comprised 18 464 TURPs and 1134 open prostatectomies, fro
m which there were 1095 subsequent repeat prostatectomies. After adjustment
for calendar time, age and admission type, the incidence rate of the first
repeat prostatectomy was up to 2.30 times higher (95% confidence interval,
1.62-3.27) after initial TURP than for initial open prostatectomy. The abs
olute risks at 8 years for TURP was 6.6%, and was 3.3% for open prostatecto
my.
Conclusion The absolute risk of a repeat prostatectomy for TURP and open pr
ostatectomy were consistent with the best reported international experience
. There was evidence that the risk in 1990-95 had declined compared with ea
rlier periods, despite a shift towards more closed procedures. The differen
tial risks of repeat prostatectomy should be explained to patients and cons
idered in the development of clinical guidelines, notwithstanding the advan
tages of TURP over open prostatectomy in terms of surgical morbidity and co
st.