T. Bjork et al., The prognostic value of different forms of prostate specific antigen and their ratios in patients with prostate cancer, BJU INT, 84(9), 1999, pp. 1021-1027
Objective To assess the prognostic value for patient survival of different
forms of PSA and ratios thereof, before treatment for prostate cancer, by c
onsidering the forms and ratios both as independent markers and by comparin
g them with other commonly used prognostic markers, e.g. tumour grade, loca
l stage (T-stage) and absence or presence of skeletal metastases (M-stage).
Patients and methods Blood samples were collected consecutively from men di
agnosed with prostate cancer at our department in 1988. From this group, 66
men were followed until death, or for greater than or equal to 9 years. Tw
enty-five patients died from their prostate cancer and 21 from other causes
during the follow-up period. Forty-eight patients received hormonal treatm
ent, whereas 18 remained untreated or received no treatment for their cance
r before they died from other causes. Assays measuring the serum levels of
free prostate specific antigen (fPSA), PSA complexed to alpha 1-antichymotr
ypsin (PSA-ACT), and total PSA (tPSA) were used to calculate the percentage
of free to total PSA (f/tPSA) fPSA/ACT and ACT/tPSA at diagnosis. Based on
the initial levels or ratios of the PSA forms, the patients were divided i
nto three numerically comparable groups (tertiles) for survival analysis. P
rognostic factors predicting patient survival were evaluated using univaria
te (Kaplan-Meier life-tables with the log-rank test) and multivariate techn
iques (Cox proportional hazards regression model).
Results Univariate analysis using the log-rank test showed that the serum l
evel of each molecular form of PSA, i.e. tPSA (P=0.001), PSA-ACT (P < 0.001
) and fPSA (P < 0.001), as well as grade (P < 0.001), T-stage (P=0.00355) a
nd M-stage (P < 0.001), provided statistically significant prognostic infor
mation. Log-rank tests showed that none of the ratios, i.e. f/tPSA, fPSA/AC
T and ACT/tPSA, were informative of prognosis (P > 0.05). However, in a mul
tivariate analysis regression model, not only M-stage (risk ratio 4.2; P=0.
026) and grade (risk ratio 2.6; P=0.022), but also f/tPSA (risk ratio 1.8;
P=0.037), provided significant prognostic information.
Conclusion The values of tPSA, fPSA and PSA-ACT, as well as grade and T- an
d M-stage, are all independent prognostic factors of prostate cancer surviv
al. In a multivariate analysis, not only M-stage and grade but also f/tPSA
provided significant prognostic information.