Allogeneic blood stem cell and bone marrow transplantation for acute myelogenous leukemia and myelodysplasia: influence of stem cell source on outcome

Citation
Ja. Russell et al., Allogeneic blood stem cell and bone marrow transplantation for acute myelogenous leukemia and myelodysplasia: influence of stem cell source on outcome, BONE MAR TR, 24(11), 1999, pp. 1177-1183
Citations number
38
Categorie Soggetti
Hematology,"Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
ISSN journal
02683369 → ACNP
Volume
24
Issue
11
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1177 - 1183
Database
ISI
SICI code
0268-3369(199912)24:11<1177:ABSCAB>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
We have compared the outcomes of 87 patients with acute myelogenous leukemi a (AML) and myelodysplasia (MDS) receiving matched sibling transplants with stem cells from peripheral blood (blood cell transplant, BCT) or bone marr ow (BMT), In good risk patients (AML in CR1) granulocytes recovered to 0.5 x 10(9)/l a median of 14 days after BCT compared with 19 days after BMT (P < 0.0001), For patients with poor risk disease (AML beyond CR1 and MDS) cor responding figures were 16 vs 26 days (P < 0.0001). Platelet recovery to 20 x 10(9)/l was also faster after BCT (good risk 12 vs 20 days, P < 0.0001; poor risk 17 vs 22 days, P = 0.04). Red cell transfusions were unaffected b y cell source, but BCT recipients required less platelet transfusions (good risk 1 vs 5, P = 0.002; poor risk 5 vs 11, P = 0.004). Blood cell transpla nts resulted in more chronic GVHD (86% vs 48%, P = 0.005) and a significant ly higher proportion of recipients with KPS of 80% or less (48% vs 5%, P = 0.004), Disease-free survival at 4 years was 23% for both groups of poor ri sk patients but outcome in good risk patients was better after BCT (93% vs 62%, P = 0.047) related mainly to less relapse. While disease-free survival may be better after BCT than BMT for AML in CR1, quality of life may be re latively impaired.