Inconsistencies in classification by experts of cardiotocograms and subsequent clinical decision

Citation
D. Ayres-de-campos et al., Inconsistencies in classification by experts of cardiotocograms and subsequent clinical decision, BR J OBST G, 106(12), 1999, pp. 1307-1310
Citations number
8
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine","da verificare
Journal title
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY
ISSN journal
14700328 → ACNP
Volume
106
Issue
12
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1307 - 1310
Database
ISI
SICI code
1470-0328(199912)106:12<1307:IICBEO>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
Inter-observer agreement in the interpretation according to the FIGO guidel ines of 33 cardiotocographic tracings by experts and subsequent clinical de cision was evaluated, using the kappa statistic (K) and the proportions of agreement (Pa). Overall agreement in the classification of tracings was fai r (K = 0.48) and was better for normal (Pa = 0.62), than for suspicious (Pa = 0.42) or pathologic tracings (Pa = 0.25). Overall agreement on clinical decision was slightly higher (K = 0.59), but mostly was centred on the deci sion to take 'no action' (Pa = 0.79). Experts especially disagreed over the decisions to 'monitor closely' (Pa = 0.14) or to 'intervene immediately' ( Pa = 0.38). These Limitations should be taken into account in clinical audi ts and in medical jurisprudence.