Purpose: We have previously shown that neuroblastoma cell lines established
from patients after intensive chemotherapy show sustained resistance to va
rious drugs and especially high resistance to etoposide (up to 51 times hig
her than a clinically achievable level). To determine whether topoisomerase
I inhibitors (topotecan and CPT-11) are effective against etoposide-resist
ant neuroblastomas, we studied the response to topotecan and the active met
abolite of CPT-11 (SN-38) in 19 cell lines with a spectrum of sensitivities
to etoposide. Materials and methods: The panel included cell lines establi
shed at diagnosis and after disease progression either during induction che
motherapy or after myeloablative therapy supported with bone marrow transpl
antation. Cytotoxicities of topotecan, SN-38, and etoposide were determined
using a microplate digital image microscopy (DIMSCAN) assay with a 4-log d
ynamic range. Results: All six etoposide-resistant cell lines were resistan
t to topotecan and SN-38 (resistance defined as LC90 higher then clinically
achievable levels for the drug). Significant cross-resistance by Pearson's
correlation analysis (r greater than or equal to 0.6) occurred between top
otecan + etoposide, topotecan + SN-38, and etoposide + SN-38. Conclusions:
Topotecan and CPT-11 do not have significant activity against most etoposid
e-resistant neuroblastoma cell lines and this suggests that agents other th
an topoisomerase inhibitors should be explored for the treatment of recurre
nt neuroblastomas.