R. Berguer et al., A comparison of forearm and thumb muscle electromyographic responses to the use of laparoscopic instruments with either a finger grasp or a palm grasp, ERGONOMICS, 42(12), 1999, pp. 1634-1645
Laparoscopic techniques allow for less-invasive treatment of common surgica
l problems. Laparoscopic instruments are different from standard surgical i
nstruments and generally incorporate a pistol-grip handle configuration wit
h rings for the fingers. This handle configuration has been reported as bei
ng uncomfortable, leading to anger compression neuropathies in some cases.
As an alternative, the surgeon can choose to grasp laparoscopic instruments
using a mon powerful palm grip during grasping motions. This study evaluat
es the hypothesis that the use of the palm grip requires less muscle tensio
n than the finger-grip when grasping with laparoscopic instruments. Nine ge
neral surgeons used an Autosuture(R) laparoscopic grasper with a ringed pis
tol-grip handle held in both a finger-in-ring (F) or palm (P) hand grip pos
ition to grasp and close two spring-loaded metal plates. The same task was
performed with a surgical haemostat clamp (H) for comparison, Each subject
performed the grasping task in a random sequence for the three instrument c
onfigurations at two grasping forces levels (0.7 and 4.2 N), and with the i
nstrument at three angles to the subjects' sagittal plane (0 degrees, 45 de
grees and 90 degrees). Surface electromyographic (EMG) signals were acquire
d from the flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU), flexor digitorum profundus (FDP), fl
exor digitorum superficialis (FDS), extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU). extensor
digitorum comunis (EDC) and the thenar compartment (TH). The peak root mean
squared (RMS) ER IG voltage was averaged for five repetitions at each inst
rument, force and angle condition. Statistical analysis was carried out by
repeated measures ANOVA. The muscle EMC RMS amplitude while using the palm
grip was decreased in the FDS, TH and EDC, was unchanged in the ECU and FCU
? and was slightly higher in the FDP when compared with the finger grip. Th
ese differences were most prominent at 90 degrees to the sagittal plane whe
re the subjects' wrists neared maximal flexion. It is concluded that the pa
lm grip is more powerful than the finger grip when grasping with laparoscop
ic instruments, particularly at angles perpendicular to the surgeon's sagit
tal plane.