This paper investigates the use of deception in two negotiation studies. St
udy 1 (N = 80) demonstrates that direct questions and solidarity curtail de
ception. Study 2 (N = 74 dyads) demonstrates that direct questions are part
icularly effective in curtailing lies of omission, but may actually increas
e the incidence of lies of commission These findings highlight the importan
ce of misrepresentation to the negotiation process and suggest approaches f
or contending with deception.