Tc. Wright et al., HPV DNA testing of self-collected vaginal samples compared with cytologic screening to detect cervical cancer, J AM MED A, 283(1), 2000, pp. 81-86
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Context More than half of the women diagnosed as having cervical cancer in
the United States have not been screened within the last 3 years, despite m
any having had contact with the health care system. In many other regions o
f the world, there is only limited access to cervical cancer screening.
Objective To determine whether testing of self-collected vaginal swabs for
human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA can be used to screen for cervical disease i
n women aged 35 years and older.
Design Cross-sectional observational study comparing Papanicolaou smears wi
th HPV DNA testing of self-collected vaginal swabs.
Setting Outpatient clinics in a periurban settlement outside of Cape Town,
South Africa, between January 1998 and April 1999,
Participants Screening was performed on 1415 previously unscreened black So
uth African women aged 35 to 65 years.
Intervention Women self-collected a vaginal swab for HPV testing in the cli
nic and were then screened using 4 different tests: Papanicolaou smear, dir
ect visual inspection of the cervix after the application of 5% acetic acid
, cervicography, and HPV DNA testing of a clinician-obtained cervical sampl
e. Women with abnormal results on any of the screening tests were referred
for colposcopy.
Main Outcome Measure Biopsy-confirmed high-grade cervical squamous intraepi
thelial lesions or invasive cancer.
Results High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions were identified in 47 (
3.4%) of 1365 women adequately assessed, and there were 9 cases of invasive
cancer. Of women with high-grade disease, 66.1% (95% confidence interval [
CI], 52.1%-77.8%) had high risk for HPV detected in self-collected vaginal
samples, and 67.9% (95% CI, 53.9%-79.4%) had an abnormal Papanicolaou smear
(P = .78). The false-positive rates for HPV DNA testing of self-collected
vaginal samples and Papanicolaou smears were 17.1% (95% CI, 15.1%-19.3%) an
d 12.3% (95% CI, 10.5% -14.2%), respectively (P<.001), A high-risk type of
HPV DNA was detected in 83.9% (95% CI, 71.2%-91.9%) of women with high-grad
e disease and 15.5% (95% CI, 13.6%-17.7%) of women with no evidence of cerv
ical disease using a clinician-obtained cervical sample.
Conclusions These results indicate that HPV testing of self-collected vagin
al swabs is less specific than but as sensitive as Papanicolaou smears for
detecting high-grade cervical disease in women aged 35 years and older, and
HPV testing offers an important new way to increase screening in settings
where cytology is not readily performed.