HPV DNA testing of self-collected vaginal samples compared with cytologic screening to detect cervical cancer

Citation
Tc. Wright et al., HPV DNA testing of self-collected vaginal samples compared with cytologic screening to detect cervical cancer, J AM MED A, 283(1), 2000, pp. 81-86
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
ISSN journal
00987484 → ACNP
Volume
283
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
81 - 86
Database
ISI
SICI code
0098-7484(20000105)283:1<81:HDTOSV>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
Context More than half of the women diagnosed as having cervical cancer in the United States have not been screened within the last 3 years, despite m any having had contact with the health care system. In many other regions o f the world, there is only limited access to cervical cancer screening. Objective To determine whether testing of self-collected vaginal swabs for human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA can be used to screen for cervical disease i n women aged 35 years and older. Design Cross-sectional observational study comparing Papanicolaou smears wi th HPV DNA testing of self-collected vaginal swabs. Setting Outpatient clinics in a periurban settlement outside of Cape Town, South Africa, between January 1998 and April 1999, Participants Screening was performed on 1415 previously unscreened black So uth African women aged 35 to 65 years. Intervention Women self-collected a vaginal swab for HPV testing in the cli nic and were then screened using 4 different tests: Papanicolaou smear, dir ect visual inspection of the cervix after the application of 5% acetic acid , cervicography, and HPV DNA testing of a clinician-obtained cervical sampl e. Women with abnormal results on any of the screening tests were referred for colposcopy. Main Outcome Measure Biopsy-confirmed high-grade cervical squamous intraepi thelial lesions or invasive cancer. Results High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions were identified in 47 ( 3.4%) of 1365 women adequately assessed, and there were 9 cases of invasive cancer. Of women with high-grade disease, 66.1% (95% confidence interval [ CI], 52.1%-77.8%) had high risk for HPV detected in self-collected vaginal samples, and 67.9% (95% CI, 53.9%-79.4%) had an abnormal Papanicolaou smear (P = .78). The false-positive rates for HPV DNA testing of self-collected vaginal samples and Papanicolaou smears were 17.1% (95% CI, 15.1%-19.3%) an d 12.3% (95% CI, 10.5% -14.2%), respectively (P<.001), A high-risk type of HPV DNA was detected in 83.9% (95% CI, 71.2%-91.9%) of women with high-grad e disease and 15.5% (95% CI, 13.6%-17.7%) of women with no evidence of cerv ical disease using a clinician-obtained cervical sample. Conclusions These results indicate that HPV testing of self-collected vagin al swabs is less specific than but as sensitive as Papanicolaou smears for detecting high-grade cervical disease in women aged 35 years and older, and HPV testing offers an important new way to increase screening in settings where cytology is not readily performed.