N. Yamazaki et al., Involvement of brain serotonergic terminals in the antinociceptive action of peripherally applied calcitonin, JPN J PHARM, 81(4), 1999, pp. 367-374
We investigated the antinociceptive effect of systemic injection of calcito
nin and its mechanisms of action in rats. Subcutaneous injection of [Asu(1,
7)]eel calcitonin (ECT, 4 U . kg(-1) . day(-1)) daily for 7 days suppressed
nociceptive hypersensitivity induced by formalin land by carrageenan); the
effect was gradually increased by the repeated injections and significant
effects were observed after administration for more than 4 days. The antino
ciceptive action of ECT (4U . kg(-1) . day(-1) for 7 days) was inhibited by
intracerebroventricular injection of the serotonergic neurotoxin 5,7-dihyd
roxytryptamine and serotonin-receptor antagonists methiothepin, cyproheptad
ine and ketanserin; methysergide showed an inhibitory tendency. Intrathecal
injections of 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine, methiothepin, cyproheptadine and ke
tanserin were without effects on the ECT action. The results suggest the in
volvement of serotonin in the brain, but not in the spinal cord, in the ECT
antinociception. Intracerebroventricular or intrathecal injection of the c
atecholaminergic neurotoxin 6-hydroxydopamine and intracerebroventricular i
njection of the alpha-adrenoceptor antagonist phentolamine were also withou
t effects on the ECT action. A subcutaneous infusion of the opioid receptor
antagonist naloxone inhibited the antinociceptive action of morphine, but
not that of ECT. Thus, adrenergic and opioidergic systems may not play impo
rtant roles in the ECT antinociception. The present results suggest that re
peated systemic injection of ECT produces analgesia and that the brain sero
tonergic terminals are involved in this action.