Making sense of "absence": Towards a typology of absence in social representations theory and research

Citation
Mc. Gervais et al., Making sense of "absence": Towards a typology of absence in social representations theory and research, J T S BEHAV, 29(4), 1999, pp. 419
Citations number
72
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology
Journal title
JOURNAL FOR THE THEORY OF SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR
ISSN journal
00218308 → ACNP
Volume
29
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-8308(199912)29:4<419:MSO"TA>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
Identifying, locating and interpreting both what is present and what is not present in theory and data lies at the core of scientific practice. Most e xperienced researchers know that social reality and psychological phenomena cannot always be apprehended directly, and that the forces that shape them must often be inferred rather than positively demonstrated. Yet, the impor tant analytical problems raised by "absence" have rarely occupied the centr e stage in professional journals. The aim of this paper is to sensitise res earchers to the problem of absence. It considers the various guises in whic h absences may appear, their repercussions in the research process, and the solutions that researchers have used to render absences visible. The paper focuses on the issue of absence as it appears in theory and research on so cial representations. A typology of absence, structured in terms of the res earch process, is proposed. The typology is intended purely as a heuristic tool. It identifies and discusses forms of theoretical, methodological, emp irical and analytical/interpretive absences. This typology is used to explo re forms of absence and their interrelationships throughout the research pr ocess in three studies on social representations. The discussion as a whole contributes to reaffirming the radical character of the theory of social r epresentations by stressing how the latter locates the space of explanation at the interface between individual and collective representations, betwee n social and cognitive processes, between intentional and non-conscious dyn amics, and between material and symbolic realities.