Zb. Johnson et al., Genetic parameters for production traits and measures of residual feed intake in large white swine, J ANIM SCI, 77(7), 1999, pp. 1679-1685
The purpose of this study was to estimate genetic parameters for ADG, backf
at thickness and loin eye area (LEA), and measures of feed intake and effic
iency for purebred Large White boars born from 1990 to 1997. Boars from 60%
of the litters were culled at weaning based on a maternal breeding value t
inder) of the dam, and remaining boars tn 26,706) were grown to 100 d of ag
e. Selection of boars for individual pen testing was based on a combination
of growth and maternal indices. Boars were fed a corn-soybean meal diet th
at was 1.14% lysine, 19% protein, and 3,344 kcal/kg ME for approximately 77
d. Boars were weighed at the beginning and end of the test, and feed intak
e was recorded. Daily feed intake (DFI), ADG, and feed:gain ratio (FG) were
computed. Four measures of residual feed intake (RFI) were estimated as th
e difference between actual feed intake and that predicted from models that
included 1) initial test age and weight and test ADG (RFI1); 2) initial te
st age and weight, test ADG, and backfat (RFI2); 3) initial test age and we
ight, test ADG, and LEA (RFI3); and 4) initial test age and weight, test AD
G, backfat, and LEA (RFI4). Genetic parameters were estimated using an anim
al model and single- or multiple-trait DFREML procedures. Models included f
ired effects of contemporary groups and initial test age as a covariate and
random animal and litter effects. Heritability estimates for test ADG, DFI
, FG, backfat, LEA, RFI1, RFI2, RFI3, and RFI4 were .24, .23, .16, .36,.24,
.17, .11, .15, and .10, respectively. Genetic correlations between ADG and
backfat, ADG and LEA, ADG and DFI, and ADG and FG were .37, .36, .82, and
-.32, respectively. Genetic correlations between ADG and measures of residu
al feed intake ranged from .11 to .18. Genetic correlations of backfat with
LEA, DFI, and FG were -.27, .64, and .40, respectively. Genetic correlatio
ns of backfat with RFI measures were higher when backfat was not included i
n the estimation of RFI. Genetic correlations for LEA with DFI and FG were
0 and -.52, respectively. Genetic correlations for LEA with RFI measures we
re all negative and ranged from -.31 to -.51. Genetic correlations indicate
that selection for reduced RFI could be made without adversely affecting A
DG. Backfat should also decrease,and LEA should increase. The amount of cha
nge in backfat or LEA would depend on the measure of RFI used.