We evaluated 20 slaughtered cattle with ultrasound before hide removal to p
redict fat thickness and ribeye area at the 12th rib for possible use in ca
rcass composition prediction. Carcasses were fabricated into boneless subpr
imals that were trimmed progressively from 2.54 to 1.27 to .64 cm maximum f
at trim levels. Stepwise regression was used to indicate the relative impor
tance of variables in a model designed to estimate the percentage of bonele
ss subprimals from the carcass at different external fat trim levels. Varia
bles included those obtained on the slaughter floor (ultrasound fat thickne
ss and ribeye area; estimated percentage of kidney, pelvic, and heart [KPH]
fat; and warm carcass weight) and those obtained from carcasses following
24 h in the chill cooler (actual fat thickness, actual ribeye area, estimat
ed percentage of KPH fat, warm carcass weight, and marbling score). At all
different subprimal trim levels, percentage KPH was the first variable to e
nter the model. In the models using measures taken on the slaughter floor,
ultrasound fat thickness was the only other variable to enter the model. Ul
trasound fat thickness increased R-2 and decreased residual standard deviat
ion (RSD) in models predicting subprimals at 2.54-cm maximum fat trim; howe
ver, at 1.27- and .64-cm trim levels, R-2 and RSD increased. Models using t
he same two variables (except actual fat instead of ultrasound) in the cool
er were similar to those using data from the slaughter floor. However, as m
ore cooler measurement variables entered the models, R-2 increased and RSD
decreased, explaining a greater amount of the variation in the equation. Ul
trasonic evaluation on the slaughter floor may be of limited application co
mpared with the greater accuracy found in chilled carcass assessment.