Effects of implants on daily gains of steers wintered on dormant native tallgrass prairie, subsequent performance, and carcass characteristics

Citation
Si. Paisley et al., Effects of implants on daily gains of steers wintered on dormant native tallgrass prairie, subsequent performance, and carcass characteristics, J ANIM SCI, 77(2), 1999, pp. 291-299
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Animal Sciences
Journal title
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE
ISSN journal
00218812 → ACNP
Volume
77
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
291 - 299
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-8812(199902)77:2<291:EOIODG>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
Fall-weaned crossbred steer calves (n = 300; 184 +/- 2.9 kg) received eithe r no implant (Control) or were implanted with Synovex(R)-C (SC = 10 mg estr adiol benzoate + 100 mg progesterone), Synovex(R)-S (SS = 20 mg estradiol b enzoate + 200 mg progesterone), or Revalor(R)-G (RG = 8 mg estradiol-17 bet a + 40 mg trenbolone acetate) to determine the effects of implants on weigh t gain during winter grazing on dormant tallgrass prairie, subsequent grazi ng and finishing performance, and carcass characteristics. Steers grazed tw o dormant tallgrass prairie pastures from October 16, 1996, until March 29, 1997 (164 d), and received 1.36 kg/d of a 25% CP supplement that supplied 100 mg of monensin/steer. Following winter grazing, all steers were implant ed with Ralgro(R) (36 mg zeranol) and grazed a common tallgrass prairie pas ture until July 17 (110 d). After summer grazing, all steers were implanted with Revalor-S(R) (24 mg estradiol-17 beta + 120 mg trenbolone acetate), a nd winter implant treatment groups were equally allotted to four feedlot pe ns. Steers were harvested November 17, 1997, after a 123-d finishing period . Daily gains during the winter grazing phase averaged .28, .32,.32, or .35 kg/d, respectively, for Control, SC, SS, or RG steers and were greater (P < .01) for implanted steers than for Controls. Summer daily gains were simi lar (1.05 +/- .016 kg/d; P greater than or equal to .61) for all treatment groups. Feedlot daily gains were also similar (1.67 +/- .034 kg/d; P greate r than or equal to .21), with implanted steers weighing 14 kg more than Con trol steers (P = .05) at harvest, despite similar management during summer grazing and feedlot phases. Control steers tended (P = .06) to have lower y ield grades. There were no differences (P = .99) in marbling between implan ted and nonimplanted steers. Steers implanted during the wintering phase ha d increased skeletal and overall (P < .01) carcass maturities compared with nonimplanted steers, which resulted in more "B" and "C" maturity carcasses . Because carcass maturity score affects quality grade, the increased matur ities of implanted steers resulted in a $9.04 decrease in carcass value/100 kg (P < .01) compared with Controls. The results of this study indicate th at growth-promoting implants are efficacious for cattle wintered on dormant native range despite low daily gains. This increased weight is maintained through the summer grazing and feedlot phases; however, the benefit of the increased weight may be offset by decreased carcass quality grade and value due to increased carcass maturity.