Jk. Apple et al., Influence of body condition score on carcass characteristics and subprimalyield from cull beef cows, J ANIM SCI, 77(10), 1999, pp. 2660-2669
Mature beef cows (n = 83) were slaughtered to measure the influence of body
condition score (BCS) on carcass characteristics and subprimal yields. All
cows were weighed and assigned BCS, based on a 9-point scale, 24 h before
slaughter. Cows were slaughtered, and, after a 48-h chilling period, qualit
y and yield grade data were collected on the left side of each carcass. The
right side was quartered, fabricated into primal cuts, and weighed. Each p
rimal cut was further processed into boneless subprimal cuts, minor cuts, l
ean trim, fat, and bone. Cuts were progressively trimmed to 6.4 and 0 mm of
external and visible seam fat. Weights were recorded at all stages of fabr
ication, and subprimal yields were calculated as a percentage of the chille
d carcass weight. Live weight, carcass weight, dressing percentage, fat thi
ckness, longissimus muscle area, muscle:bone ratio, and numerical yield gra
de increased linearly (P = .0001) and predicted cutability and actual muscl
e-to-fat ratio decreased linearly (P =.0001) as BCS increased from 2 to 8.
Carcasses from BCS-8 cows had the most (P < .05) marbling. The percentage o
f carcasses grading U.S. Utility, or higher, was 16.7, 20.0, 63.6, 43.3, 73
.3, 100.0, and 100.0% for cows assigned a BCS of 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, r
espectively. At 6.4 mm of fat trim, carcasses from BCS-5 cows had higher (P
< .05) shoulder clod yields than carcasses from cows having a BCS of 6, 7,
and 8. Carcasses of BCS-2 cows had lower (P < .05) strip loin yields than
carcasses from BCS-3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 cows. Top sirloin butt yields were hig
her (P < .05) for carcasses of BCS-8, 3, 4, and 5 cows than those of BCS-B,
7, or 8 cows. Carcasses from BCS-7 and 8 cows had lower (P < .05) tenderlo
in and inside round yields than carcasses of BCS-5, or less, cows. At both
fat-trim levels, carcasses from BCS-5 cows had higher (P < .05) eye of roun
d yields than cows assigned BCS of 2, 7, or 8. When subprimal cuts were tri
mmed to 6.4 mm of visible fat, carcasses from BCS-5 cows had higher (P < .0
5) total lean product yields than cows assigned a BCS of 2, 4, 7, and 8. Re
gardless of fat trim, total fat yields increased (P =.0001) and total bone
yields decreased (P =.0001) linearly as BCS increased from 2 to 8. Although
carcasses from BCS-5 and 6 cows had the highest yields of lean product, ca
ttle producers and packers may benefit most by marketing and(or) purchasing
BCS-B cows because a higher percentage of their carcasses had quality char
acteristics deemed desirable for fabrication into boneless subprimal cuts.