The authors hypothesized that action planning leads to the temporal binding
of response codes, which then are less available for the planning of other
actions. Four experiments showed evidence for this code occupation hypothe
sis. In Experiment 1, participants prepared a left or right finger movement
(A), performed another left-right choice reaction (B), and then executed A
ction A. In case of a partial feature overlap between A and B, reaction tim
e for B increased. The same was true in Experiment 2, in which B was perfor
med with the left or right foot. Experiment 3 showed that response-feature
binding occurred only when there was sufficient time to form a plan. When A
was precued but not intentionally prepared, feature overlap produced a dec
rease in reaction time. Experiment 4 revealed that A benefited from feature
overlap with B at short delays but not at longer delays between B and A. T
his finding was presumably due to leftover activation in feature codes afte
r plan execution, whereas overlap costs in B were unaffected by delay.