The authors studied relations between postural sway, optical flow, and cons
traints on posture imposed by a suprapostural looking task. Optical how res
ulted from unperturbed sway and was not imposed by the experimenters. Parti
cipants fixated a distant target or a nearby target. In the key condition,
participants looked past (i.e., ignored) a nearby target to fixate the dist
ant target. The authors recorded the variability of head position as a meas
ure of the amplitude of postural sway. In 5 of 7 experiments, sway variabil
ity was influenced by the location of the fixated target not by the distanc
e of the nearest visible surface (the unfixated nearby target). Postural sw
ay was modulated to facilitate the performance of suprapostural tasks and w
as not driven by optical flow in an autonomous (task-independent) manner. T
he authors concluded that posture can be understood only in the context of
explicit manipulations of suprapostural tasks.