This study was aimed at determining whether the ordered-subset expectation
maximum (OSEM) is more effective than filtered backprojection (FBP) for bon
e SPECT in the routine clinical context. Methods. Fifty-seven consecutive b
one SPECT studies were analyzed. They included pelvic and lumbar spine, tho
racolumbar spine, head and neck, feet and shoulders. A 64-projection SPECT
study was acquired over 360 degrees by single-head cameras 2-3 h after the
injection of 750 MBq Tc-99m-methylene diphosphonate. Three observers compar
ed the OSEM and FBP reconstructed images. Results. Streak artifacts, always
present with FBP, were rarely generated with the OSEM. When present (n = 2
4), artifacts associated with negative values near hyperactivities in FBP w
ere not generated with the OSEM in 67% of the cases (n = 16), permitting a
satisfactory interpretation of these regions. In half of the other cases (1
7%, n = 4/24), interpretation was precluded, in only one case did the three
observers agree that more hyperactivities were seen with the OSEM. Ninety-
six percent of the OSEM pictures were superior or equal to FBP for anatomic
resolution and were clearly better in 12% of the cases. The extent of the
lesion with the OSEM seemed better or equally defined in 96% and clearly be
tter in 14% of the cases. The low-activity regions were better or equally v
isualized in all cases and were clearly better seen in 23% of the cases. Th
e quality of the pictures was found to be better or superior with the OSEM
in 98% of the cases and definitely better in 65% of the cases. Conclusion:
Replacement of FBP by the OSEM in bane SPECT would be beneficial to clinica
l practice.