Electron injection dynamics of Ru-II(4,4 '-dicarboxy-2,2 '-bipyridine)(2)cis(NCS)(2) adsorbed on MoS2 nanoclusters

Citation
Bt. Langdon et al., Electron injection dynamics of Ru-II(4,4 '-dicarboxy-2,2 '-bipyridine)(2)cis(NCS)(2) adsorbed on MoS2 nanoclusters, J PHYS CH B, 103(50), 1999, pp. 11176-11180
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Physical Chemistry/Chemical Physics
Journal title
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
ISSN journal
15206106 → ACNP
Volume
103
Issue
50
Year of publication
1999
Pages
11176 - 11180
Database
ISI
SICI code
1520-6106(199912)103:50<11176:EIDOR'>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
The electron injection dynamics of Ru-II(4,4'-dicarboxy-2,2'-bipyridine)(2) cis(NCS)(2) (N3 dye) ads orbed on MoS2 nanoclusters have been studied using static and time-resolved optical spectroscopy. Static spectroscopy and the comparison with Ru-II(2,2'-bipyridine)(2)cis(NCS)2 indicate that the N3 is bound to the MoS2 nanoclusters and that the binding occurs through the car boxylates. The static absorption spectrum of adsorbed N-3/MoS2 is red shift ed about 1.2 nm compared to N3 in an equivalent acetonitrile/hexanol/tridod ecylmethylammonium iodide solution. The extent of the spectral shift indica tes that the coupling is comparable to that in the N3/TiO2 case. The time-r esolved results indicate that about 35% of the adsorbed dyes inject electro ns into the MoS2 conduction band on the 250 ps time scale, and about 65% do not inject. These results indicate that electron injection is comparativel y slow in these systems (250 ps compared to <100 fs in N3/TiO2) because of the low density of conduction band states in these quantum-confined nanoclu sters. We speculate that the biphasic decay may be understood in terms of a mechanism in which one of the 4,4'-dicarboxy-2,2'-bipyridine Ligands is at tached to the nanocluster, while the other ligand is not attached. The atta ched and nonattached ligands have strong and very weak electronic coupling to the nanocluster, respectively. Electrons in the MLCT state localized on the attached ligand undergo injection on the 250 ps time scale, while those localized on the nonattached ligand do not inject. in this model, attached -to-nonattached interligand electron transfer competes with electron inject ion and lowers the injection quantum yield to the observed value of 35%.