Ab. Elmoselhi et Ak. Grover, Peroxide sensitivity of endothelin responses in coronary artery smooth muscle: ETA vs. ETB pathways, MOL C BIOCH, 202(1-2), 1999, pp. 47-52
Endothelins (ETs) contract de-endothelialized rings from left descending co
ronary artery via ETA or ETB receptors. Here we test the hypothesis that th
e actions of ETA and ETB receptors are similar in their sensitivities to da
mage by hydrogen peroxide. In Ca2+-containing Krebs' solution, 100 nM of th
e ETB agonist IRL1620 produced contractions with significantly smaller forc
e (17.6 +/- 1.7 mN) than 50 nM of the ETA + ETB agonist ET-1 (73.2 +/- 4.6
mN) (p < 0.05). In Ca2+-free solutions, the contractions due to both agents
were significantly smaller (p < 0.05). Pretreating the tissues with peroxi
de inhibited the contractions produced by either agent. The IC50 values for
peroxide were significantly higher (p < 0.05) using ET-1 (1.0 +/- 0.3 mM i
n Ca2+, 1.4 +/- 0.1 mM in Ca2+-free) than using IRL1620 (0.32 +/- 0.08 in C
a2+, 0.25 +/- 0.01 mM in Ca2+-free). Pretreating microsomes isolated from t
he artery smooth muscle with up to 10 mM peroxide did not significantly aff
ect I-125-ET-1 binding to ETA or ETB receptors (p > 0.05). In comparing the
peroxide induced inactivation of the various processes in this artery and
based on literature, we conclude that the actions of ETA may also involve a
peroxide resistant Ca2+-independent pathway(s).