This paper presents a field study exploring the differences between two met
hods of mapping organizational cognition - social representation and causal
mapping. After introducing the two methods and describing the mapping proc
edures in detail, the paper discusses the different outcomes yielded by the
two methodologies. Conditions of use and intrinsic limitations of each met
hod art then examined in the light of the results. The paper concludes with
some reflections on the notion and practice of mapping organizational cogn
ition.