Mj. Gabel et Gl. Hager, How to succeed at increasing spending without really trying: The balanced budget amendment and the item veto, PUBL CHOICE, 102(1-2), 2000, pp. 19-23
Congressional efforts at budgetary reform generally contain procedural impe
diments designed to limit profligate spending. In particular, the line-item
veto and the balanced budget amendment are intended to limit the ability o
f legislators to pursue their constituents' interests through pork-barrel p
olitics at the expense of the broader public interest. However, assuming th
at legislators remain motivated by local constituent interests, we argue th
at these reforms will promote unexpected results. The supermajorities requi
res by the line-item veto and the balanced budget amendment include incenti
ves for log-rolling that promote - and may indeed increase - pork-barrel sp
ending.