A. Besson et al., Functional results correlated to laxity with Miller-Galante cemented totalknee prosthesis: A 44 cases study with 6 years of follow-up, REV CHIR OR, 85(8), 1999, pp. 797-802
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Ortopedics, Rehabilitation & Sport Medicine
Journal title
REVUE DE CHIRURGIE ORTHOPEDIQUE ET REPARATRICE DE L APPAREIL MOTEUR
Purpose of the study
The preservation of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) was introduced in
total knee arthroplasty to improve the quadriceps efficiency and the range
of flexion in stairs. The purpose of this study was to determine if these
goals were achieved with the Miller-Galante total knee prothesis and to ass
ess the relation between knee laxity and function.
Material and Method
We assessed retrospectively the results of 48 consecutives Miller-Galante w
ith PCL retaining. Four patients were excluded: 2 died, 2 lost to follow-up
. Forty-four prostheses were evaluated in 38 patients mean aged 65 (33-79).
The preoperative HSS score was 41 +/- 12.4 [21-63]. All the components wer
e cemented with patellar resurfacing (25 metal-backed, 19 polyethylene). St
ressed Xrays with Telos(TM) device were performed to assess frontal and ant
ero-posterior laxity. All radiographic measurements were carried out with a
digitizer (Orthographics(TM)).
Results
After 6 years of follow-up, 8 prostheses (18.1 p. 100) were already revised
because of: 1) 3 excessive anterior tibial translations and severe polyeth
ylene wear; 2) 5 femoro-patellar disorders. These last 5 knees (4 patellar
metal-backed) had a greater patellar thickness [(25 mm +/- 1.2) (p = 0.01)]
.
The mean HSS knee score for the 36 remaining prostheses was 73.8 +/- 11.3 (
35-92). Only 5 patients were able to climb stairs without support. The mean
mechanical axis was 2.3 degrees in varus, bur 81 percent of the knees were
at 5 degrees around neutral position. The mean laxity in valgus was 4 degr
ees +/- 2.3 degrees [1-10], and 4.1 degrees +/- 2.1 degrees [1-9] in varus.
The mean anterior tibial translation was 5.3 mm +/- 5 [1-17] and posterior
laxity was 4.7 mm +/- 2.5 [1-10]. HSS knee score was lowered by 9 points w
hen frontal laxity (valgus + varus) was greater than 5 degrees (p = 0.01),
and by 9.8 points when posterior laxity was 5 mm or more (p = 0.02). The me
an thickness of the patella was 22 mm +/- 2.3 [16-27].
Discussion
These results were unsatisfactory considering the high revision rate and th
e low functional score observed despite of a correct implant positioning. T
he major challenge for PCL retaining (i.e. free stair climbing) was achieve
d in few cases. The wide range of posterior laxity underlined the difficult
ies to control PCL tension. On the other hand, PCL tension has to be contro
led as it could influence knee function. Patello-femoral disorders was the
main reason for revision surgery and an insufficient patellar bone resectio
n may be contributive. Sagittal anterior laxity was the second reason for r
evision and it should be carefully detected as it could drive to catastroph
ic polyethylene wear.
Conclusion
The advantages of PCL retaining were not demonstrated with this low constra
ined design. Surgical control of PCL tension could give a wide range of pos
terior laxity. Sagittal femoro-tibial laxity and femoro-patellar disorders
should be detected before severe polyethylene wear. These results advocates
for: I)more congruent designs with PCL retaining or for PCL substituting d
esigns, 2) improvement of patello-femoral design.