The history of science has often been presented as a story of the achieveme
nts of geniuses: Galileo, Newton, Maxwell, Darwin, Einstein. Recently it ha
s become popular to enrich this story by discussing the social contexts and
motivations that may have influenced the work of the genius and its accept
ance; or to replace it by accounts of the doings of scientists who have no
claim to genius or to discoveries of universal importance but may be typica
l members of the scientific community at a particular time and place. In th
is article I consider a different type of story, which further research mig
ht reveal to be more common than we now suspect: progress stimulated by gad
flies - outspoken critics who challenge the ideas of geniuses, forcing them
to revise and improve those ideas, resulting in new knowledge for which th
e genius gets the credit while the gadfly is forgotten.