The energetics controversy is understood variously as energy vs. atoms, the
rmodynamics vs. statistical mechanics, phenomenalism vs. realism, equations
vs. pictures, and especially Ostwald vs. Boltzmann. It is generally though
t that at Lubeck in 1895 Boltzmann and Planck demolished energetics, but wh
ile its momentum was slowed, energetics in one or more of the above senses
still retained supporters as late as the great physics conference at the St
. Louis World's Fair in 1904. Indeed, after Ostwald himself abandoned it in
1908, Ernst Mach began for the first time to defend it. The main emphasis
in this paper, however, is on Georg Helm (1851-1923) who had been invited t
o Lubeck to be the main speaker on energetics. He had adopted his position
earlier than Ostwald and his views avoided many of the errors and oversight
s in Ostwald's approach. Indeed, Helm could be called the strongest defende
r of energetics, even if Ostwald was Boltzmann's main target. Helm was larg
ely Machist in philosophy at that time and did not reify energy.