This paper is an attempt to clarify why Ludwig Boltzmann from about 1895 to
1905 seemed to adopt a series of extreme epistemological positions, rangin
g from phenomenalism to pragmatism, while emphatically rejecting what he ca
lled 'metaphysics' (by which he meant all traditional philosophy). He concl
uded that all philosophical differences were merely linguistic and most wer
e ultimately meaningless. But at about the time that young Ludwig Wittgenst
ein began absorbing these desperate ideas (1905), Boltzmann himself under t
he influence of Franz Brentano seemed to assume a type of representationali
sm about the external physical world, while in his own mind adopting it for
pragmatic reasons. Why? Because "it worked''. He seems to have defended hi
s non-representationalist Bildtheorie on similar grounds, but his suicide f
ollowed shortly (1906).