H. Hikita et al., Short-term fasting and the reversal of the stage of promotion in rat hepatocarcinogenesis: Role of cell replication, apoptosis, and gene expression, TOXICOL SCI, 52(2), 1999, pp. 17-23
Studies of the multistage nature of hepatocarcinogenesis in the rat have le
d to the development of models having significant potential application to
carcinogenesis in other tissues as well as other species. Whereas the initi
al and final stages of carcinogenesis-initiation and progression-involve ge
netic changes and are operationally irreversible, the intermediate stage of
promotion is operationally reversible acid can be modulated by a variety o
f environmental factors. Numerous investigations have demonstrated that chr
onic caloric restriction modifies neoplastic development, primarily during
the stage of promotion, so that fewer lesions develop. Short-term fasting o
f rats, initiated with a non-necrogenic dose of diethylnitrosamine (DEN) ac
id promoted with 0.05% phenobarbital (PB) for 4 weeks, results in loss of v
irtually all of the measurable altered hepatic foci (AHF) after two 5-day p
eriods of fasting with an intermediate 2-day period of feeding. This change
was accompanied by a marked decrease in bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) labeling
of hepatocytes within AHF together with a significant increase in apoptosis
of such cells measured by nick end-labeling. Similar but lesser effects we
re noted in surrounding, nonfocal hepatocytes, On refeeding, both the numbe
rs and volume percentage of AHF returned within 2 weeks to values seen in n
onfasted controls. Administration of PB during the fasting period did not a
lter these results, although AHF reappeared more rapidly in such animals on
refeeding. Nuclear DNA fragmentation was evident in samples of whole liver
from fasted animals. During this same period the expression of c-myc mRNA
increased 3- to 9-fold, while levels of albumin and insulin-like growth fac
tor I mRNAs decreased significantly. This study demonstrates a model system
in which the reversibility of the effects of promoting agents may be rapid
ly determined and the effects of chemopreventive inhibitors of promotion ma
y be rapidly evaluated.