Activity-based model of psychic development is critically analyzed and the
means to solve its problems are offered. The author's point of view is that
in cultural-historical theory of activity and in based on the latter devel
oping education theory there is dual notion of human being as of individuum
and as of personality. Another problem is insufficiently strict separation
of <<activity>> and <<behavior>> notions and inadequate studing of <<activ
ity subject>> notion. The author considers the way of person's understandin
g oneself in activity to be a moving power of development. Periodisation of
psychic development existing in activity theory is analyzed. The author ar
gues that qualitative change of activity system is to be periodisation crit
erion.