Poverty defense, and the environment - How policy optics, policy incompleteness, fastthinking.com, equivalency paradox, deliberation trap, mailbox dilemma the urban ecosystem, and the end of problem solving recast difficult policy issues
E. Roe, Poverty defense, and the environment - How policy optics, policy incompleteness, fastthinking.com, equivalency paradox, deliberation trap, mailbox dilemma the urban ecosystem, and the end of problem solving recast difficult policy issues, ADMIN SOCIE, 31(6), 2000, pp. 687-725
In addition to being uncertain and complex, the policy world is incomplete;
at any point in time, most of the work of policy makers and policy analyst
s is unfinished or yet to be done. Policy incompleteness, uncertainty, mid
complexity have made fastthinking imperative: just-in-time thinking to matc
h our just-in-time schedules in our just-interrupted task environments. The
usual remedy, more deliberation, is frequently no longer possible and, eve
n if it were, it has its own difficulties. If fastthinking is here to stay
and we are in the twilight of conventional problem solving, then policy ana
lysts need new ways to deal with permanently incomplete policy issues. Poli
cy optics allow us, the practicing policy analysts, to recast familiarly in
tractable problems of poverty, defense, and the environment into a more tra
ctable light They do not solve policy incompleteness, bur they enable us to
start tasks that we have a better chance of finishing.