The 44 Liquormart decision, eliminating Rhode Island's ban on liquor price
advertising, made Rhode Island the subject of a natural experiment for meas
uring the effect of advertising on prices. Using Massachusetts prices as co
ntrols, we find that advertising stores substantially cut only prices of th
e products that they advertise. Prices of other products, at both advertisi
ng and nonadvertising stores, do nor change. Advertising stores cut their p
rices on products advertised by rivals, while nonadvertising stores do not.
We find no reductions in price dispersion across stores. Newspaper-adverti
sing stores appear to draw a higher share of customers after they advertise
. (JEL L11, L51, L66).