Bicameralism and its consequences for the internal organization of legislatures

Citation
D. Diermeier et Rb. Myerson, Bicameralism and its consequences for the internal organization of legislatures, AM ECON REV, 89(5), 1999, pp. 1182-1196
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Economics
Journal title
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW
ISSN journal
00028282 → ACNP
Volume
89
Issue
5
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1182 - 1196
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-8282(199912)89:5<1182:BAICFT>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
Theories of organization of legislatures have mainly focused on the U.S. Co ngress, explaining why committee systems emerge there, but not explaining v ariance in organization across legislatures of different countries. To anal yze the effects of different constitutional features on the internal organi zation of legislatures we adopt a vote-buying model and consider the incent ives to delegate decision rights in a game among legislative chambers. We s how how presidential veto power and bicameral separation can encourage a le gislative chamber to create internal veto players or supermajority rules, w hile a unicameral structure can encourage legislators to delegate power to a leader. (JEL D72).