B. Larsen et al., Recovery of cognitive function after remifentanil-propofol anesthesia: A comparison with desflurane and sevoflurane anesthesia, ANESTH ANAL, 90(1), 2000, pp. 168-174
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
We compared the recovery characteristics of remifentanil, desflurane, and s
evoflurane when used for anesthesia in elective operative procedures. Sixty
ASA physical status I and II patients, aged 18-65 yr, were randomly assign
ed to receive remifentanil-propofol, desflurane-N2O, or sevoflurane-N2O ane
sthesia. Before the induction of anesthesia, the patients of the desflurane
and sevoflurane groups received fentanyl 2 mu g/kg. In all groups, anesthe
sia was induced with propofol and maintained either with remifentanil 0.25
mu g.kg(-1).min(-1), desflurane, or sevoflurane 0.85 MAC with 65% nitrous o
xide in oxygen. Anesthetics were titrated to achieve an adequate level of s
urgical anesthesia and to maintain mean arterial pressure within 20% of bas
eline values. Early recovery times and a modified Aldrete Recovery Score >
9 were recorded. Trieger Dot Test and Digit Substitution Test (DSST) were p
erformed the day before surgery and in the postanesthesia care unit to eval
uate intermediate recovery. The remifentanil-propofol group had a significa
ntly faster emergence than desflurane or sevoflurane, with no difference be
tween both inhaled anesthetics. Thirty min after anesthesia administration,
patients in the remifentanil-propofol and in the desflurane groups gave si
gnificantly more correct responses in the DSST compared with sevoflurane (r
emifentanil 87%, desflurane 83%, sevoflurane 56%), the impairment in the se
voflurane patients corresponding to the effects of a blood alcohol level. o
f approximately 0.1% and, thus, being of clinical importance. Ninety minute
s after anesthesia administration, no significant difference could be demon
strated among the groups in the DSST scores. Emergence and return of cognit
ive function was significantly faster after remifentanil-propofol compared
with desflurane and sevoflurane up to 60 min after anesthesia administratio
n. Implications: We compared awakening and intermediate recovery times afte
r remifentanil-propofol anesthesia to desflurane-N2O and sevoflurane-N2O an
esthesia. Emergence and return of cognitive function was significantly fast
er after remifentanil-propofol compared with desflurane and sevoflurane up
to 60 min after anesthesia administration.