Effects of group size and feeder space allowance on welfare in finishing pigs

Citation
Ham. Spoolder et al., Effects of group size and feeder space allowance on welfare in finishing pigs, ANIM SCI, 69, 1999, pp. 481-489
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Animal Sciences
Journal title
ANIMAL SCIENCE
ISSN journal
13577298 → ACNP
Volume
69
Year of publication
1999
Part
3
Pages
481 - 489
Database
ISI
SICI code
1357-7298(199912)69:<481:EOGSAF>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
Compared with small groups, housing in large groups offers the pig more tot al available space, resulting potentially in an increased degree of control over its (micro) environment. For the producer, large groups require fewer pen divisions and offer more possibilities for the sharing of resources su ch as feeders and drinkers. However, whilst large groups may offer benefits to higher ranking animals in the group, there may be serious disadvantages for those further down the social hierarchy, who also need to compete for access to resources. This study investigated the interactive effects on wel fare of food availability (one single space hopper per 20 or per 10 pigs) a nd group size (20, 40 or 80 pigs per pen), at constant stocking density (0. 55 m(2) per pig) in part-slatted pens. Groups provided with two feeding spa ces per 20 pigs were less active than,groups with one feeding space per 20 pigs. The number of aggressive interactions per pig at the food trough was not affected by group size but decreased with number of feeder spaces per 2 0 pigs. The number of skin lesions increased with group size. Average daily gain in the first half of the finishing period was negatively influenced b y group size and positively by number of feeding spaces. No effect on weigh t gain was found subsequently. Within-group variation in growth was not aff ected by group size or number of feeder spaces. No differences between trea tments were found in the number of pigs removed for health reasons. Interac tive effects of the two treatments were found on some behaviours but not on any of the performance variables measured. It is concluded that, from a we lfare point of view, the number of pigs per feeder spare should be lower th an 20, although performance levels appear acceptable at 20 pigs per feeder. Further research will have to identify whether the effects of group size o n general aggression is common to all finishing pig systems, or whether the presence of straw can serve as a mitigating factor.